Rabu, 05 Oktober 2016
EXPERT
BIOGRAPHY OF CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
Teun
Adrianus van Dijk
was
born on May 7, 1943 in Naaldwijk, Netherlands. He was a scholar in the field of
text linguistics, discourse analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis. Since the
1980s his work in Critical Discourse Analysis focuses primarily on the study of
the discursive reproduction of racism with what he called 'elite symbolic'
(politicians, journalists, scholars, writers), the study of the news in the
press, and on the theory of ideology and context. Teun A. van Dijk is a
professor of discourse studies at the University of Amsterdam from 1968 to 2004,
and since 1999 he has taught at Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona. He has a
lot of lecturing internationally, especially in Latin America.
Of
the many criticisms of discourse analysis are introduced and developed by some
models of van Dijk is the most widely used models. This is likely due to van
Dijk connected discourse elements that can usefully be put and used
practically. Model van Dijk is often referred to as "social
cognition". According to Dijk study of discourse is not enough just based
on text analysis only, since the text is merely the result of a manufacturing
practices must also be observed. In this case to be seen how a text is
produced, to obtain a knowledge of why text can like this.
Process
production and this approach is very typical van Dijk, which involves a process
known as social cognition. This term was adopted from the approach in
psychology social, mainly to explain the structure and process of formation of
a text. The approach is known as a conjunction of social helping determine how
the production of texts that involve complex processes can be studied and
explained.
To
illustrate the model, van Dijk made a lot of media coverage analysis study. Van
Dijk point of concern, especially in the study of racism. Lots of racism
manifested and expressed through writing. An example can be seen in daily
conversations, job interviews, teacher meetings, debates in parliament,
political propaganda, advertising, scientific articles, editorials, news,
photos, movies, etc. He also saw how the social structure, dominance, and power
groups in society, and how cognition and consciousness formed and influenced
the specified text.
Discourse
by van Dijk described has three dimensions namely text, social cognition, and
social context. Dijk combines three dimensions of the discourse into a unity of
analysis. In the text, which examined is how the structure of the text and
discourse strategies used to emphasize a particular theme. Social cognition
study the induction process involving text news from reporters individual
cognition. While the third aspect that social criticism is studying building a
growing discourse in society to be a problem.
Critical
discourse analysts are concerned with elucidating the dialectical relationship
in which the discoursal aspect of social structures and social practices both
constitutes and is constituted by those structures and practices (van Dijk
2001).
Van
Djik (2006) notes that political situations do not simply cause political
actors
to speak in certain ways, instead “there is a need for a cognitive
collaboration
between
situations and talk or text, that is a context” (Van Djik, 2006, p.733).
Suchcontexts define how participants
experience, interpret and represent the for-themrelevant aspects of the
political situation. Political discourse is not only defined with political
discourse structures but also with political contexts. Thus, acting as an MP,Prime
Minister, party leader, or demonstrator will typically be perceived by
speakersor recipients as a relevant context category in political discourse.
Thus
for example a typical focus of CDA research is on the nature and usage of
racist language and how this usage both reflects and reinforces racist
institutional policies and individual
racist attitudes. Given this kind of focus, it is not surprising that, in
contrast to most mainstream discourse analysis, CDA practitioners do not see
their work as value-neutral scholarship. Rather, they aim to transcend the
academic/activist divide, seeing their work as not merely describing the inequitable
discourse practices pertaining to problems of race, gender, class and so on,
but also contributing to the contestation and even transformation of those
practices. This aim, however, has been the target of criticism by several
opponents of CDA.
There
are some handbooks by Van Djik such as :
Introduction:
Discourse analysis as a new cross-disciplineIn: van Dijk, (Ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis (C3), 1985. (C.3.), Vol. 1., pp. 1-10.
Introduction: Levels and dimensions of discourse analysis.
In: van Dijk, (Ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis (C3) 1985. (C.3.), Vol. 2., pp. 1-11
Introduction: Dialogue as discourse and interaction.
In: van Dijk, (Ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis (C3) 1985. (C.5.), Vol. 3., pp. 1-11
Introduction: The role of discourse analysis in society. 1983.
In: van Dijk, (Ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis (C3) 1985. (C.5.), Vol. 4., pp. 1-8
Introduction: The common roots of the studies of discourse and literature.
In: van Dijk, (Ed.) Discourse and Literature, pp. 1-9. 1985. (C.4.)
Introduction: Discourse analysis in (mass) communication research.
In: van Dijk, (Ed.) Discourse and Communication , 69-93, 1985. (C.5.)
Semantic discourse analysis.
In: Teun A. van Dijk, (Ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 2. (pp. 103-136). London: Academic Press, 1985.
REFERENCE
https://mufatismaqdum.wordpress.com/2011/03/25/sekilas-tentang-teun-a-van-dijk-dengan-analisis-wacana-kritis/
http://www.discourses.org/download/articles/
https://www.lang.nagoya-u.ac.jp/proj/genbunronshu/29-2/haig.pdf
What is the popular book of Van Djik?
BalasHapusthe populer book by Teun van dijk is discourse and knowladge a sosiocognitive approach
Hapushallo desi member, I want you explain what is the political discoure accourding by van dijk , thanks
BalasHapuspolitical discourse is identified by its
Hapusactors or authors, viz., politicians. Indeed, the vast bulk of studies of political
discourse is about the text and talk of professional politicians or political
institutions, such as presidenta and prime ministers and other members of
government, parliament or political parties, both at the local, national and
international level.
good presentation brother,can you give example of social pratice from your expert?
BalasHapusthe example of social practice ,we know Teun van dijk work in Critical Discourse Analysis focuses primarily on the study of the discursive reproduction of racism with what he called 'elite symbolic' (politicians, journalists, scholars, writers), the study of the news in the press, and on the theory of ideology and context.so, he use social for his journal and the news issue such as society to be a problem.
Hapusassalamualaikum..........
BalasHapuswhat is the best book by Teun Adrianus van Dijk ?
walaikumsalam...
Hapusthe best book by Teun Van dijk is discourse and knowladge a sosiocognitive approach
hey sister desi,,i will ask you answer my question
BalasHapuswhere the place or city van Dijk was born?? thank
hy...the place or city Teun Van dijk in Naaldwijk, Netherlands
HapusKomentar ini telah dihapus oleh pengarang.
BalasHapushallo my sister :)
BalasHapusi wanna question for your blog, my question is what links between political discourse analysis with critical discourse analysis. please explain and why ?
Introduction: The role of discourse analysis in society. 1983.for political discourse and Introduction: The role of discourse analysis in society. 1983.in critical discourse analysis
HapusHello Kak Desi. Could you tell me about your expert's books that became a course book or standard book in an university?
BalasHapushello. for university, we used discourse analysis for communication research and semantic discourse analysis.because we learn about semantic and discourse analysis in our lesson.
Hapushy sis, my question is what is definition political discourse by your expert?
BalasHapusHY..
HapusPoliticians in this sense are the group of people who are being paid for their (political) activities, and who are being elected or appointed (or self-designated) as the central players in the polity. This way of defining political discourse is hardly different from the identification of medical, legal or educational discourse with the respective participants in the domains of medicine, law or education
Politicians in this sense are the group of people who are being paid for their (political) activities, and who are being elected or appointed (or self-designated) as the central players in the polity. This way of defining political discourse is hardly different from the identification of medical, legal or educational discourse with the respective participants in the domains of medicine, law or education
Hapuswhat is the popular theory of van dijk?
BalasHapusthe popular theory of my expert is CDA OR CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
HapusHello sister..I have question for you,why you interest with Teun Van Dijk to expert??
BalasHapusiam very interest with my expert explain about discourse analysis is very complete with link and handbook from him for reader
Hapushy desi... Could you mention to me about your expert's books that became a course book or standard book in an university?thank you desi..
BalasHapusthe standard book used for university arediscourse analysis for communication research and semantic discourse analysis.because we learn about semantic and discourse analysis in our lesson.
HapusHi Desi. I have a question for you. During his life, did he have elaborated research, journal, books, or anything with the other experts?
BalasHapusof course.he elaborated with De Gruyter, 1985, pp. 69-93.
Hapusin Structures of news in the press article
Hey dangduters 😸
BalasHapusYour blog cute not same with you.
I have question for you desi. What the phenomenal book of your expert and theory of teun van dijk?
hay ....the phenomenal book by my expert is Introduction: The role of discourse analysis in society. 1983.
Hapushay desi..does he ever elaborated to made books to other expert?give reason?
BalasHapusyes.alright.he elaborated with De Gruyter, 1985, pp. 69-93.
Hapusin Structures of news in the press article.
Hello desi memberti :)
BalasHapusWow, traditional song for your blog, I like it. Love Indonesia so much :D
From your explanation abaout Teun Adrianus van Dijk, I am interested and I want to know how the Teun Adrianus van Dijk career start at the beginning so that he could become an expert in CDA?
Thank you :)
career of my expert start from ehen he as a professor of discourse studies at the University of Amsterdam from 1968 to 2004, and since 1999 he has taught at Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona. He has a lot of lecturing internationally, especially in Latin America.
HapusI want to ask to you, why did you choose him, while there are many experts out there? please explanation why and what you get after choosing him? Thanks
BalasHapuswhy i choose him for my expert? i like theory for discourse analysis is CDA from him and we can understanding material with easy...tq
HapusHi Miss, nice posting. Actually I don't have any question about Teun Adrianus van Dijk. I just wanna give you a suggestion. I think, better you add more songs in your blog in order the viewers don't feel bored when they always hear the same song every open your blog. Tq
BalasHapustq for your suggestion for my blog miss...
BalasHapusassalamualaikum desi..
Hapusi wanna ask you about your expert. any another experts beside Teun Adrianus van Dijk that you like?
#tq.
no question for you desi . our expert has same . thanks
BalasHapusHi, Desi. Nice blog. From many books of Teun Van Dijk, can you give me one explanation about DA from your choosen expert?
BalasHapusanime blog bro,my quetion is,why you interested with CDA?
BalasHapushi desi.. how much books teun van dijk? please choise for me. thank you
BalasHapusHello desi memberti!
BalasHapusso many books published by teun van dijk .tel me please the famous one of of those books.
tq
hai sista maybe you could sharing about the best book create by Teun Adrianus van Dijk?
BalasHapusthank you..
Hi miss Desi,nice blog. Actually I don't have comment for your blog. Thank you
BalasHapusHi kak Des,
BalasHapusSo fr your explanation so clear
so, I haven't question for you